|
|
|
|
IntelliChoice Value Rating
The chart above shows the purchase price versus ownership cost for each car from a specific vehicle class. The cars with better than average ownership cost/purchase price correlations are the best values, and these best value cars are represented by the dots below the curve. (i.e. the cars that have a lower ownership cost compared to its purchase price.) Those cars, which are worse than average or poor values, appear above the curve.
One way to view the graph is to draw a vertical line through any purchase price. You may see several dots that fall on this line - each of which is a car with a similar purchase price. However, notice the difference in ownership costs of each car represented by the vertical position of the dot. Two cars with the same purchase price can have thousands of dollars difference in ownership costs. This is what separates "good value" cars from "poor value" cars.
What is a good car value?
A "good car value" is one whose cost to own and operate is less than expected. The lower the cost to own and operate a car compared to what is expected, the better the value of that car.
But how do we know a car's "expected cost"?
For each car in the class, IntelliChoice plots the car's purchase price against the total five-year cost to own and operate it as determined by IntelliChoice research. Each dot on the above chart represents a specific car. Generally, we find that as the purchase price of the car increases, the cost to own and operate that car increases. This is why the dots on the graph tend to rise upward and to the right. This phenomenon also makes intuitive sense - as the purchase price rises, financing costs tend to rise, as do insurance, depreciation, taxes, and most other car ownership costs.
This is an important concept. It's normal for car ownership costs to rise as purchase price rises. Therefore, we can't just establish one "average" ownership cost number for each class, since cars in the class have different purchase prices. (This is why the "Relative" shown on each chart is different for cars in the same car class.)
Using statistical techniques, IntelliChoice "connects the dots" to form a curve that defines, for this car class, the relationship between the car's purchase price and car's ownership costs. This curve is our "expected cost" curve. The curve defines, for any car in the class, the five-year ownership cost that we would expect to see at each possible purchase price. If every car in the class were an average value, then all the dots would fall exactly on the curve. However, it's rare that any dot is exactly on the curve. Some dots are a little higher or lower, and some are a lot higher or lower. The dots that are a little lower are better than average car values, while the dots that are a lot lower are excellent car values (A dot that is a lot lower than the curve has ownership costs much lower than expected for a car of its purchase price). Conversely, a dot a little higher than the curve is a poorer than average car value, while a dot that is much higher than the curve is a poor car value.
Value is a relative term, not an absolute term. It is performing better than the logical expectation.
So is a Mercedes-Benz E320 expensive to own and operate? Certainly in an absolute sense. Most other cars cost less. But, when its cost to own and operate is plotted against cars with comparable invoice prices, the E320 costs less. So the E320 is not expensive to own and operate - it is a good car value. The Mercedes does not have low ownership costs, but it has low ownership costs for its invoice price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Review From Automobile Magazine
2008 Audi TT roadsterBy Georg Kacher / Photography by Jürgen Skarwan /
Article provided by: Automobile Magazine
 |  | |
Replacing an automotive icon with a model that's equally visionary, charismatic, and unmistakable is surely one of the toughest tricks for any car designer. Case in point: the Audi TT, whose original form was designed by Freeman Thomas and J Mays. At the Los Angeles auto show last November, Audi unwrapped the second-generation TT roadster, which was shaped by Walter de'Silva, who currently heads the styling departments at Audi, Seat, and Lamborghini. The new TT is evolutionary in appearance and character, but it also shouts progress in terms of packaging and presentation. The new car features a more dynamic exterior that blends well with the shape of Audi's mid-engine R8 supercar and the forthcoming A5 coupe. The long, low nose instantly clarifies which end is which, the extended wheelbase supports the transition from banzai speedster to proper sports car, and the increased dimensions deliver make it more spacious. At the same time, de'Silva retained all the trademark radii, the sculptured flanks, and the rounded-off overhead views. This is still a little masterpiece. Like the TT coupe, the roadster can be powered by the 200-hp, turbocharged and direct-injected 2.0-liter four or, in Quattro guise, by the 250-hp, 3.2-liter V-6. A metamorphosis of the narrow-angle V-6 first launched in the 1992 Volkswagen Corrado SLC, the engine is sufficiently torquey and powerful--but it's also an acoustic nonevent, is quite thirsty when pushed, and cannot muster the same grunt as the 300-plus-hp sixes offered by the competition. In combination with Quattro, however, it turns the TT into an extremely sure-footed and efficient all-weather machine. But that's tempered by a calculated coldness and detached driving dynamics, both of which come as a result of putting the prime emphasis on roadholding. What this approach lacks is feedback and tactility--it's more remote-control self-confident than hands-on intuitive. Anyone who likes the Volkswagen GTI will like the front-wheel-drive TT roadster with the 200-hp engine. No, it doesn't provide the V-6 Quattro's riveting traction when accelerating hard out of a wet hairpin, but it feels pretty special nonetheless. What's so nice about the 2.0-liter four is the way it produces ample torque without sacrificing horsepower. The torque plateaus from 1800 to 5000 rpm, and you can rev the hell out of the sixteen-valve engine before it will cut off the fuel feed at 6800 rpm. Fuel economy beats the V-6 by eighteen percent on paper and by probably double that in real life. This from an engine that accelerates the TT roadster, no lightweight at 3130 pounds, from 0 to 60 mph in 6.3 seconds and takes it to a governed 130 mph. ... >>next page
|
|
Does anyone own an Audi TT?
Hey Audi TT convertible owners! My company AIM Research (www.aimresearchnetwork.com), with our partner GfK Automotive...
08/13/2007 | 06:08 AM
|
|
|
2000 Audi TT quattro good buy?
Looking for cars I stumbled on a 2000 Audi TT quattro 5 speed. Everything seems great, the price is right (12000 with...
04/30/2007 | 21:04 PM
|
|
|
More pics of the upcoming Audi TT
I think the new design is great...its nice and flows really nicely......
11/01/2006 | 12:11 PM
|
|
|
Audi TT COupe
New York auto show The new TT, a 2008 model in the U.S. when it arrives next year, will get a host of goodies. The new...
04/17/2006 | 18:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Audi TT Coupe
If Apple built cars, they probably would look and feel a lot like the new Audi TT. Like the iPod, the new TT is a tailor-made tool for the digital age. It's oh-so-cool in appearance and character, it ...
more
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |